Posts Tagged ‘Energy saving’
March 11th, 2008 | 
Author: You often hear statistics about showers being more efficient than baths. A bath usually uses a lot more water than a shower, so you’re not only using a lot more fresh water, you’re using a lot more energy to heat that extra water.
But consider what happens when you take a shower. The incoming water might be 10 degrees Celsius (50 F). The temperature is then raised to say, 43 degrees Celsius (110 F). The water cascades over your body and then goes down the drain.
It is estimated that about 95% of the energy used to heat the water to a comfortable temperature is simply going down the plughole.
If you have an electric shower unit, you could actually recover some of that energy.
An electric shower connects directly to the cold water supply. A very powerful heating element (typically 8 or 9 kW) then rapidly heats the water to produce an almost instant supply of hot water.
In the winter time, incoming water may be colder than in the summer time, so you need to use more energy to heat the water to the required temperature.
So how can we recover the wasted energy?
The answer is a simple heat exchanger, which transfers the heat from the waste water to the incoming water supply.
Basically what happens is this: the cold water supply runs through a pipe that either coils around the waste pipe, or runs through the inside of the waste pipe.
As the shower starts to flow and hot water goes down the waste pipe, it starts to heat up the cold water inlet pipe. Heat has been transferred from the waste to the cold supply.
The supply water is now several degrees warmer than it was before, so the shower unit needs to use less electricity to heat the water up.
Heat exchangers of this type are commercially available, but it wouldn’t be beyond the capabililties of a competent DIY enthusiast to make one for himself.
You would need to ensure that the cold water supply had a check-valve to stop warmed water going back to the cold supply.
Your shower unit would also need to be thermostatically controlled. A standard shower unit would simply apply the same amount of energy to the warmer water, resulting in scaldingly hot water output. You might end up having to adjust the temperature manually several times during a shower to compensate for the changes in temperature.
Related Reading:
Posted in Energy saving, Home Improvement | 
Tags: energy efficiency, Energy saving, wasted energy | 
No Comments »
Yesterday, 28th February 2008, was the UK’s first “Energy Saving Day”. Results from the electricity generating companies indicate that electricity consumption for that day was
marginally higher than the average! So much for that idea.
Personally, I didn’t know it was Energy Saving Day until I read about it on the BBC News website at lunchtime – half-way into the day. I asked my colleagues if they knew if it was Energy Saving Day, and they didn’t know either.
We weren’t alone in our ignorance – comments on the BBC’s website indicated that other people didn’t know about it either.
Looks like the publicity department of the organisation that thought up this idea took the concept to heart and consumed no energy whatsoever in telling people about it.
Related Reading:
Everyone is talking about saving energy, and quite rightly too.
In the home, saving energy means saving money, and one of the quickest and easiest ways to save is in lighting.
Most homes use incandescent bulbs for their lighting. These are the standard bulb with a coiled filament that glows when you apply electricity to it.
But did you know that these have an energy efficiency of only about 2%? That means for all the energy you feed into it, only one fiftieth of that energy is converted to light energy. The rest is mainly heat. That’s why light bulbs get so hot.
The new Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) on the other hand have an energy efficiency of between 7% and 10%. That still doesn’t sound very good, but what it does mean is that to get the same amount of light out of it, you only need to supply it with between one quarter and one fifth of the energy.
Now that we’ve established that they use a lot less energy, what about the cost?
The prices of CFLs has come down rapidly in the last year or so, and they are now about 3 times the price of conventional incandescent bulbs. Furthermore, they last about 10 times longer, so you don’t need to replace them quite as often. So in real terms, they actually cost about one third of the price of conventional bulbs.
Consider that in the winter, you might leave a light on from 4pm to 11pm (7 hours). Let’s say that it costs 1 penny (UK) to run a 100 Watt incandescent bulb for 1 hour.
In 1 month, it will have cost about £2.97 to run that light bulb. For the four months November to February, that would come to £11.88.
A CFL of the same light output uses just 22 Watts. Over the same period, that would cost £2.62, a saving of £9.26. That’s enough to buy 3 CFLs.
Now that’s for just one lightbulb. How many more do you use in your house? You could easily save up to £100 a year by switching.
Don’t wait until your incandescent bulbs have blown before replacing them with CFLs - it’s cheaper to throw away your incandescent bulbs now!
In the UK, incandescent bulbs will be withdrawn from sale in 2012. You don’t need to wait until then to switch over. Do it now and save some money.
